Justin Bieber on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine out August 2012

HOT.READY.LEGAL! lol Nice one.

Well when there’s a magazine cover you know there’s gonna be a gorgeous photoshoot coming out. Looks like this photoshoot will tend to be on the sexy side 😉

Remember the last time Justin was on the Rolling Stone cover in February 2011?

Justin Bieber fans, better known as “Beliebers” have been named the greatest superfan community of the past 20 years by Rolling Stone Magazine.

According to the magazine the Justin Bieber fans are the easiest to spot. Usually the come in the form of teenage girls, however, there are male and more mature “Beliebers” out there as well. In fact, Kim Kardashian, Chelsea Handler, and Johnny Depp have all proclaimed that they have “Bieber Fever.”

A “Belieber” is noticeable by these traits, reveals Rolling Stone: “Their primary activities include creating giant poster collages with photos cut from magazines, Tweeting with handles like “MrsBieber,” writing Bieber’s name over and over on the back of their notebooks, shrieking at the sound of his name and writing fan fiction where he dumps Selena Gomez, marries them and never gets rid of that hairstyle.”

Justin’s fans are so loyal they have even beaten out Clay Aiken’s “Claymates,” Katy Perry’s “Katycats,” Nicki Minaj’s “Barbies,” Adam Lambert’s “Glamberts,” Mariah Carey’s “Lambs,” Rihanna’s “Navy,” New Kids on The Block’s “Blockheads,” Hanson’s “Fansons,” “Glee’s” “Gleek’s” and Lady Gaga’s “Little Monsters.” Noticeably absent from the list was “Twilight’s” “Twihards.”

So keep on Beliebin’ Belieber’s, you obviously have a powerful voice and aren’t afraid to use it. Justin Bieber would be very proud.

EXAMINER

On Thursday, Rolling Stone said it had made an editing error that included an incomplete quote from the teen star.

On its website, the magazine said the full quote was: “Um. Well, I think that’s really sad, but everything happens for a reason. I don’t know how that would be a reason. I guess I haven’t been in that position, so I wouldn’t be able to judge that.”

Rolling Stone reporter Vanessa Grigoriadis, who came under fire in some quarters for asking the teen about abortion in the first place, defended her line of questioning Thursday on Twitter.

“A 16 year old kid, to be 17 in a couple weeks, who has control over a large population should be asked all questions,” she tweeted.

Grigoriadis attempted to interpret Bieber’s comments in an interview with gossip site PopEater.

“I think he meant that God has a plan,” she told PopEater.

“Even for the most die-hard Christian, it’s hard to justify rape as part of God’s plan, and harder to justify rape that leads to pregnancy and abortion. I think he was wrestling with that in his answer, which I found to be solid and logical. I think it is being widely misunderstood. He did not say that rape was part of God’s plan.”

GLOBE & MAIL

“A 16 year old who has control over a large population should be asked all questions.” Really?

This Vanessa Grigoriadis must be really bright. What kind of journalist asks a 16 year old about abortion, sex, AND politics? (Seems to me like she had planned on asking him these loaded questions on purpose.) She then publishes a misquote making the poor guy look like a retard and now all the media is reporting that Justin thinks rape is part of God’s plan and therefore a person who is raped must keep the baby. No adult celebrity wants to be questioned about abortion. Justin is 16! ARgghhh!!

Just go away already. You ain’t Barbara Walters and Justin isn’t Obama.

Speaking of Barbara Walters, look how heated the conversation got this morning on the topic.

And for the record let me say that this is one thing I don’t agree with Justin on. I think a woman should have the right to have an abortion. It doesn’t mean that you should abort and I know there are probably a few that abuse that right. But if a woman does not have the right to make decisions about her own body then we will never see a day when men and women would be seen as equals. It’s not about life or death because we can’t exactly determine that in a fetus but it’s about a woman’s human rights.